It’s an already unpopular system due to its propensity for false positives and abuse, and this would be heightened if potentially infringing videos could not be uploaded at all. Proponents of the Directive on Copyright argue that this means that people are listening to, watching and reading copyrighted https://bigbostrade.com/ material without the creators being properly paid for it. Currently, platforms such as YouTube aren’t responsible for copyright violations, although they must remove that content when directed to do so by the rights holders. The EU parliament voted 15 to 10 not to remove Article 13 from the proposal.

«The text only requires that [platforms] either license or remove copyrighted material.» The reason why this article has been dubbed the “meme ban” is that no one is sure whether memes, which are often based on copyrighted images, will fall foul of these laws. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter. When the responsibility of checking content for copyright violations will fall on companies, they will have to use filters to make sure no uploaded content contains copyright protected material.

Travis Kelce will see a lot of Roquan Smith in the middle of the field, as well as Marcus Williams over the top. Rashee Rice lines up in the slot quite often, and will have to deal with Hamilton there. If and when he heads outside, he could see Marlon Humphrey, who returned to practice this week, but could also see Brandon Stephens and cloud coverage to his side. Coming off two of their best offensive performances of the year, the Chiefs will now face the toughest defense they have seen all season. Baltimore finished the regular season ranked first in FTN’s DVOA, with the league’s seventh-best unit against the run and best defense against the pass. These are just some of the possibilities, but because of how vague the law is, it’s hard to see how it might be upheld when the time comes.

1. YouTube’s current Content ID gives copyright owners the right to claim ownership of content already live on YouTube.
2. In a humorous twist, some users created memes about the possible ban on memes, like the hand-drawn version of a popular Drake meme pictured below, originally posted on Reddit by user Yamezj.
3. The directive limits how copyrighted content is shared on online platforms.

At the same time, Wojcicki talks about the dangers of Article 13 (now known as Article 17) and how the company is under siege in the European Union. In the meantime, heavy lobbying continues to take place behind the scenes from both the creative and tech sector. In the run up to December, Google sent a large delegation of managers and senior execs to Brussels to directly lobby policy makers, according to one music executive closely involved. “They met commissioners, directors general, Prime Ministers, everyone involved from the member states,” the person says. Providing that trilogue meeting proceeds smoothly, the agreed text then has to be ratified by the legal affairs committee before a final vote on the directive can take place, probably in March or the final Plenary session in April. Many in the entertainment industry support Article 13, as it will hold websites accountable if they fail to license material or take it down.

Phone calls are generally the most effective method, since you know they actually answer them. If you’ve been lurking around the internet recently, you may have seen a lot of drama about this «Article 13» in the EU going around. Since most of the other sites are political action groups that want your money, and many others do a garbage job of explaining this, I’ll try to explain this as briefly and simply as possible. One random discord server I was in just linked everyone to saveyourinternet.eu because apparently EU is trying to kill internet as we know it.

Why Does Article 13 Matter?

Last week, the minister for universities and science Chris Skidmore confirmed that the UK will not implement the EU Copyright Directive after leaving the EU. The screenshot below shows a tweet from the user-dependent media platform of a “mockup” of what might’ve happened to YouTube if draft Article 13 passed. However, more broadly, internet users are concerned about the impact of the legislation on copied or remixed content. In addition, some argue that the proposal gives no indication about which internet platforms would need to introduce these new filters. This is simply a suggestion, with all the foundations of a law, for the governments residing in the EU.

Critics say it would be impossible to pre-emptively license material in case users upload it. Boiled down, all this article is saying is that any websites that host large amounts of user-generated content (think YouTube, Twitter and Facebook) are responsible for taking down that content if it infringes on copyright. Companies that host large amounts of user-generated content – like YouTube, Twitter and Facebook – were particularly against the change, as it placed greater onus on them to police the content on their platforms. Google claimed that the move would «change the web as we know it»; YouTube encouraged a protest hashtag «#saveyourinternet». Article 13 – a controversial piece of copyright legislation that is now called Article 17 but is more colloquially known as «the meme ban» – is no more, in the UK at least.

What does Article 13 say?

Interestingly enough, particular attention has been paid to the status of ‘Internet memes’ as an example of how copyrighted material is used and shared across the Web. Well, Article 13 was the one that stirred plenty of attention once being revealed publicly. Directly related to the filtering of copyrighted content and making big tech companies liable for hosting such content (even without their knowledge), it’s poised to have long-term consequences for everyone involved.

Will the directive definitely pass into law?

On April 15, 2019, the European Council – the political body composed of government ministers from each of the 28 EU member states – voted to adopt into EU law the copyright directive as passed by the European Parliament in March. Six member states (Finland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden) voted against adopting the directive while three (Belgium, Estonia and Slovenia) abstained from the vote. The European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, to use its full name, requires the likes of YouTube, Facebook and Twitter to take more responsibility for copyrighted material being shared illegally on their platforms. Ultimately, it all depends how much internet platforms invest in artificial intelligence.

Join public protests

Thankfully, memes and GIFs will still be allowed, thanks to recent tweaks to the law. «Creators of content have a much better chance of obtaining a fair remuneration for their work, and European citizens have also a much better chance of accessing quality content online,» he said. Alexandru Giboi, secretary general of the European Alliance of News Agencies, added that it would be a «win-win solution for both the trustworthy, quality media and the public”. «Four years of titanic tussling later, our work to solve the ‘value gap’ now begins a new stage after this vote, namely, to ensure that those who make the music make a fair return,» said ICMP director general John Phelan. If you were to share a funny Game of Thrones gif or meme on, say, Facebook or Twitter, unless you have furnished proof of ownership or of a license, your post will not be allowed to go live, and even if it did, would have to be deleted. The simplest (and the most effective) way to circumvent the new law is by using a VPN.

“It’s a very fluid process and the situation is changing daily,” elaborates one music industry insider, who like others Billboard spoke to requested to remain anonymous. Ms Berry said Article 13 still contained some «broad and ambiguous terms», such as the requirement for services to demonstrate «high industry standards of professional diligence». It warned its Content ID system only worked if rights-holders engaged with it and «provided clarity» about what material belonged to them.

If those deadlines are not met, the fear from the music industry is that the Copyright Directive will not get passed before a new European Parliament is elected in May. Were that to happen, the directive would not be dead in the water, but it is likely that a new Parliament would want to thoroughly review such a contentious, high-profile piece of legislation before passing it, significantly delaying its introduction. According to a blog post by Pirate Party MEP Julia Reda, who strongly opposes Article 13 on the grounds of censorship, 11 countries voted against the proposed Council text, including Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands and Sweden. Currently, most video game publishers let gamers share videos of their gameplay online. Video gamers who share their gameplay on video-streaming services such as Twitch and YouTube highlight the complexity of copyright online.

The protests seem to attract a pretty big crowd and continue to rise in numbers as well as people joining them, making thousands to march in the streets. Europe-wide protests are planned to take place on 23rd of March (according to European Digital Rights) with maps showcasing the place of protests and where trading gbp usd to gather in certain cities that are joining the protest. When the creator’s freedom will be curbed, consumers won’t be able to enjoy the diverse content they are able to enjoy presently. As creators won’t be able to upload song remixes or karaoke night videos, the options you have will become limited.

«Filters will subject all communications of every European to interception and arbitrary censorship if a black-box algorithm decides their text, pictures, sounds or videos are a match for a known copyrighted work,» said a blog by online rights group EFF. How much of an article has to be shared before a platform has to pay the publisher? After years of debate and negotiations, politicians have passed sweeping changes following a final vote in the European Parliament. Far and wide articles have decried the new legislation which aims to update copyright law in Europe.